upvote
SuperSpeed, but you’re not supposed to use that as a consumer facing label anymore

> NOTE: USB4® Version 2.0, USB4® Version 1.0, USB 3.2, SuperSpeed Plus, Enhanced SuperSpeed and SuperSpeed+ are defined in the USB specifications however these terms are not intended to be used in product names, messaging, packaging or any other consumer-facing content.

USB-IF’s recommended name for this port is now just “USB 10Gbps”

Not that I would expect an average consumer to understand that as a label, but at least it takes up less space and allows relative comparisons better than USB 3.0 SuperSpeed+ or whatever the old equivalent was.

https://www.usb.org/sites/default/files/usb_data_performance...

reply
> it assumes nothing about the user's knowledge except for the ability to read.

Sometimes I question whether some users have that ability

reply
Most people can read; it’s comprehending what they just read that’s the deal-breaker.
reply
> I legitimately have no idea what "SS" means next to a port

surströmming

reply
Do. Not. Open. That. Port.
reply
USB 3.0 was marketed as SuperSpeed USB. SS-marked ports should give you 5Gbit/s, compared to 480 Mbps USB 2.0.
reply