undefined

points

[-]

I get that you lack the intellectual capability and capacity to make the point yourself, which is why you refer to others without linking, to make the point on your own, its ok. I also understand that your own internal bias and lack of actual ownership/responsibility/liability, which might be tied to the intellectual deficiencies noted up top, to understand the danger of executives/leaders shipping applications given their access to information.

But you are totally free to build a company where there is no oppressive corporate IT, where there is always an incentive to innovate and grow, you can build that future.

The reason why that will not happen might be contained within the first ten words of the first sentence of my first paragraph, but you can prove me wrong. Let me be your motivation! Your dream should be your reality!

by infecto26 days ago|

parent|

[-]

Sorry we hit a sore spot and I am sorry that I started the conversation poorly but I hope you also gain some self awareness that some of it was in how rude you yourself are.

Not sure by you keep thinking I have anything to prove to you. My point stands. The governance and risk are very valuable discussion and it’s going to change between industry and the trust level of each group.

Unfortunately most IT is short sighted and trying to play catchup. We had 3 years of thinking about how these tools are going to impact the workplace and are now rushing to catch up while also being insistent that Copilot is a worthwhile alternative. I generally disagree with that. I am not advocating that IT oppressive but that unfortunately most IT leaders are not technical and it shows.