upvote
I'm not in an IT dept (developer instead), but I'd bet money that would get you a thorough dressing down by an executive involved with the insurance. That sort of blaming goes over well with those at the bottom of the hierarchy, and poorly with those at the top.
reply
The insurance people are not a part of the company, so I'm not sure who would be offended.

I wouldn't be mean about it. I'm imagining adding a line to the email such as:

> (Yes, I know this is annoying, but it's required by our insurance company.)

What is the insurance company going to do, jack up our rates because we accurately stated what their policy was?

reply
The problem is that this particular insurance company was picked by someone who does work in yours.
reply
This seems like a pretty awful place to work if my bosses have such fragile egos they can't handle me saying "our insurance requires us to do X". I'm not even really passing judgement on whether X is good or bad.

I'm not saying you're wrong, I've never worked in a company this large (except for a brief internship), or in IT specifically. But also, like, come on people, grow up.

reply
You would probably have no idea what the requirement actually said or where it ultimately came from.

It would've gone from the insurer to the legal team, to the GRC team, to the enterprise security team, to the IT engineering team, to the IT support team, and then to the user.

Steps #1 to #4 can (and do) introduce their own requirements, or interpret other requirements in novel ways, and you'd be #5 in the chain.

reply