They're dismissive because we've had the same moral panics before with the introduction of photography, then sound recordings, and then digital art tools, and then vector art, and then 3D, and also the Internet to an extent, and...
replyYou can see where this is going, right? In the end, humanity and even artists will be fine overall, even if the world changes.
Nah it'll be the end. And welcomed, because humans are too apathetic to vote for real issues like UBI.
replyWe'd rather be tribal and hate on race, gender, sexuality, religion, location, etc than actually act our neuron counts.
This feels different to me. This isn’t the camera going from film to digital. This is the camera taking over the photo creation process, and developing them, and selling them. What’s the point of the human?
replyIt feels different because you are living through the change. What happened before is something you read about and already know the outcome. Future generations will say the same.
replyhow will artists be fine when Google can steal all their work, then use that to compete with them and ultimately replace them
replyfor the cost of showing ads?
Cost is nothing because this service isn't offered currently. No income lost and might spark an interest in coloring books which grows the artist's income.
replyArtists have been around and existed in more repressive societies throughout time. The best art is usually produced from the greatest struggle. Artists will engage and create art in this new world. The cost of not providing a new surface for artists to explore is what kills art.
How does buying an AI generated coloring book lead to more sales for the artist that doesn’t offer AI generated coloring books?
reply[dead]
reply