undefined

points

by shakna2 days ago |

comments

by eastbound1 days ago|

[-]

That’s not what the judge argued. He accused me of falsifying the document by doctoring it before printing.

Which shows:

- How much bad faith you have, assuming I argumented to a judge on a false hypothesis,

- Condescension to assume that I’m not a scientist who masters p-values,

- And ultimately, you confirm the hypothesis that you lead your research in bad faith, knowing full well the true level of violence from women and hiding it, which leads to more child deaths. You are accessory to criminality.

Your attitude confirm as well that it’s good this entire field of researched be defunded, it is a net win for science.

by dotancohen1 days ago|

parent|

[-]

I'd really appreciate to hear about your research and where I could read about the violence. My Gmail username is the same as my HN username. Thank you!

by shakna1 days ago|

parent|

prev|

[-]

The p-value is useless, where the t-value does not hold substance. One depends upon the other. If there's too much of a degree of freedom, it doesn't matter if the p-value looks accurate. The data is probably no longer normally distributed, requiring non-parametric testing.

You've leapt to me being a researcher acting in bad faith, accusing me for a whole industry. As to defunding an entire field of research, it sounds like you'd like statistics or mathematics defunded? I'm afraid they will persist regardless. Too many industries depend upon them.