upvote
eliminating ambiguity is impossible. the reader should work to find the strongest interpretation of the writer's words
reply
that’s a lot to expect of readers… good writing needs to give readers every opportunity to find the good in it.
reply
It is a lot to expect of readers... It's also explicitly asked of us in this forum. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html. "Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith."
reply
fair point
reply
it’s fine for a forum to try to have different expectations than the local cafe - that’s kind of like a host asking their guests to remove shoes before walking into their home. but it doesn’t really change a priori basic facts about good writing.

perhaps this is the appropriate forum to reference pg

https://paulgraham.com/writing44.html

https://paulgraham.com/essay.htm

reply
It's also natural language though, one can find however much ambiguity in there as they can inject. It hasn't for a single moment come across as pretentious to me for example.

Think of all the tiresome Twitter discussions that went like "I like bagels -> oh, so you hate croissants?".

reply