upvote
Yeah, though I've added lots of privacy protections to at least partially mitigate that:

- There's a global blacklist of sites, as well as phrases in the title/URL (e.g. "bank")

- You can blacklist sites yourself

- Each sentence is run against filters checking for medical/legal/etc info, as well as checks for addresses, card/social security numbers, etc. All the checks are done client side

- There are also some special implementations, e.g. it looks at the source code of websites to work out if they're an instance of an American health portal that I've forgotten the name of - each doctor's surgery self-hosts it.

- Websites can add `nuenki-ignore=true` on their end, if they'd like to disable it.

And of course it doesn't log anything, though there is an anonymous cache in order to make it economical.

reply
What about a whitelist? I might just be interested in only having certain sites, like this one or Reddit, translated into my target language. That way I can be certain it is only turned on for sites that I am OK with sharing browsing history and not be concerned that I might have missed adding something to the blacklist.
reply
That's a good point. At some point I ought to make a UBlock-origin style list of customisable rules.

At the moment I'm focused on translation quality, but I intend to add that.

reply
Thanks!
reply
This is a great idea. Specifically, I want this enabled when I'm wasting time but not when I'm working. So I'd like it to be enabled only on X.com. This whitelist+blocklist functionality could be a user-side setting like with Adblockers.
reply