> How do you discern that a “deepfake” (what a dumb term) is similar to you and not just similar to anyone else?
replyPresumably the only reason to use a deepfake of a specific person is to produce things specifically in relation to that person. Otherwise, why bother? So “is this about the individual or just coincidence?” isn’t likely to be a factor in any complaint made. This seems like a hypothetical rather than something that is likely to need answering in practice.
You are missing the malicious intent. Maybe I simply claim that whatever you created is a “deepfake” of me and now you owe me. I’ll just assume you have heard of parent trolls? Wanted to make a very we will see AI/Deepfake trolls?
replyYou presume both too much and not enough.
> Maybe I simply claim that whatever you created is a “deepfake” of me and now you owe me.
replyHow are you going to do that unless it actually looks like you?
Given a large enough set of generated character there will be many that look like some real person. The cited "you" could refer to any of aesthetic collisions.
replyYes, and what happens when they try to argue that somebody made a deepfake of some random person and they are asked what the motive is? Or when it goes through discovery and it’s plainly obvious deepfakes weren’t used? Courts aren’t gullible automatons.
replyThe amazing thing is that we have different countries and they can all do their own thing.
replyThen we see how they’re doing and decide - hey let’s not be like them.