This guy asked his 20 developers, how many of you use ai? and 10 said yes. So he does the ceo thing and tells the world 50% oh my god we can fire so many people now!
Infer it from the article:
“as much as 30% to 50% of the company’s work is now completed by AI”
There. That’s not nothing.
You can and should call bs on all corporate claims, but this idea that coding agents at scale don’t work or is just total fluff is just wrong.
What I’m seeing is that people over 25 who like to write code and have spent their lives “perfecting” their environment and code generation process, can’t stand that businesses prefer lower quality code that’s created faster and cheaper than their “perfect” code.
Software engineers (and engineers generally) are closer economically to day laborers than theoretical physicists - but we/they refuse to believe that.
This is why unionization matters but you can’t unionize divas until they actually start losing jobs.
With AI, companies can built some rigid analytics/tests/benchmarks, which could be used at scale.
Both are useful, but the former situation is one that just makes good engineers more useful/in demand imho.