We detached this comment from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45093824.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44772030 (Aug 2025)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44770591 (Aug 2025)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44161363 (June 2025)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40239393 (May 2024)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39222099 (Feb 2024)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37759361 (Oct 2023)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37759152 (Oct 2023)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37741801 (Oct 2023)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37397355 (Sept 2023)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37354391 (Sept 2023)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36158274 (June 2023)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35818403 (May 2023)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32335600 (Aug 2022)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29408468 (Dec 2021)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28385149 (Sept 2021)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24984132 (Nov 2020)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22667632 (March 2020)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22244528 (Feb 2020)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16987471 (May 2018)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9822899 (July 2015)
Sums it up nicely.
Edit: Btw, please don't use quotation marks to make it look like you're quoting someone when you aren't: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
Edit 2: sorry, I was totally wrong about that! see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45106871
Also you removed/downvoted my request that asked posters to identify regions they are hiring from, specifically one about Stockholm. I’m curious what motivates such actions.
> Also you removed/downvoted my request that asked posters to identify regions they are hiring from
Do you mean https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45095800? I didn't remove or downvote it. I did detach it from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45095292 because it seemed to be a general comment that belonged at the top level, rather than a response to a particular job ad.
Wouldn't mind my post being moved to the "top" level, but in reality it means buried at the bottom. Especially since my account is a second-class citizen for some reason. Probably I had a bad day several years ago. :-/
I searched thru algolia and that quote came at first from user queSide 1 month ago, not by mixmastamyk. Unless they're the same person or the search is flawed
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
Even apart from that, I'm not sure how one could distinguish legit from non-legit cases, short of raiding company offices.
I’ve pointed this out before [1], we need a way to call out bad actors, and not allowing for such comments is only protecting bad actors.
Basically it would need to be a product in its own right. That may well be valuable, there's probably a need for it, — in that sense I agree with you and the other commenters making similar points. But it's not something HN can be.
> not allowing for such comments is only protecting bad actors
It also protects good actors. There are bad and good actors on both the supply and demand side of these transactions. It's easy to forget that if one is personally identified only with one side or the other, but the hiring market is fraught these days.
I can show examples from this current / latest monthly postings