upvote
Microsoft is also guilty of reading the market and keeping up compatibility to make their products remain relevant. Prof. Green makes sweeping statements about how Microsoft should break compatibility to remove these vulnerabilities, but he doesn't have the market pressures that Microsoft does.

Could Microsoft work harder on this? Sure. Do they have to worry about keeping their Customers happy? Absolutely.

The corporate IT market moves at a glacial pace. Hopefully the rise of IT security issues having actual business consequences will change that, but that's not Microsoft's problem. That's the ecosystem they live in.

Were bad protocol / design decisions made in the past? For sure. Microsoft has been working on this (see Managed Service Accounts and Group Managed Service Accounts). It takes time for corporate customers to adopt these new versions.

Corporate IT won't forklift out old systems without business justification. Maybe the pressure from the insurance industry will help. Pressure from the ransomware industry is a certainly helping, too.

reply
Corporate IT just forklifted out tons and tons of workstations and laptops for the windows 10 to 11 migration.

Active Directory is just not developed anymore, its basically abandonware that everyone still uses. The new hot stuff is the Azure AD/Entra ID bastardization of Web Auth plus AD that they try to upsell people to.

reply
Active Directory got some major major major updates in Server 2025.

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/get-started...

Including the relevant:

> Kerberos changes for Algorithms used for Ticket Granting Tickets: The Kerberos Distribution Center will no longer issue Ticket Granting Tickets using RC4 encryption, such as RC4-HMAC(NT).

reply
Kerberoasting specifically targets service tickets, not TGTs. I wonder if the change really only applies to TGTs or if they simply neglected to mention service tickets.
reply
> Corporate IT just forklifted out tons and tons of workstations and laptops for the windows 10 to 11 migration.

That's just client computer replacement, though. That's a known quantity and is on most IT orgs. roadmaps. We've been replacing computers regularly since we got PCs.

Moving to new AD functional levels, even when the actual risk is minimal, is something I've seen IT orgs. drag their feet on out of fear.

reply
> new AD functional levels

Fear of change is real in more areas than this.

I can't wait to decom our last 2012 R2 DCs and upgrade to something from this decade "soon".

reply