Are these optional? If not, I don't see how this makes sense:
>It doesn't really have to cost that much.
(b) They only pulled that stunt on art that was already behind suitably-protective covers. (Whether the stunt is effective or not, they weren't putting artwork at risk: just temporarily disrupting the operation of galleries, and getting themselves arrested.)
(c) This is completely off-topic.
Typical line-item cost ranges (USD) for a 36" × 36" piece
Conservation assessment / condition report: $150 – $1,200
Conservation treatment (if needed): $200 – $3,000+
Museum-grade framing (materials + custom frame + museum glazing): $800 – $4,000
Custom crate: $300 – $1,500
Fine-art transport (local/domestic): $200 – $2,000 (international: $1,500 – $10,000+)
Insurance while in transit/installation: depends on declared value (e.g., 0.2%–2% of value for a short transit, but many institutions roll it into exhibition insurance) — $50 – thousands
Installation labor / mountmaker / registrar time: $200 – $1,500
Misc (hardware, climate packs, small repairs, documentation): $50 – $600
Scenario totals (realistic museum contexts)
Modest / in-house, low-value work (museum does framing in-house or uses a local framer; local transport; no major conservation):
Estimated total: $1,500 – $4,000.
Typical world-class museum standard (professional conservation framing, custom crate, fine-art courier, conservator sign-off, installation by mountmaker/registrar):
Estimated total: $4,000 – $12,000.
High-end / high-value or international loan (specialist conservator treatment, museum-grade anti-reflective glass, climate-controlled international shipping, high insurance, specialized rigging):
Estimated total: $12,000 – $50,000+ (could rise much higher for multimillion-dollar works because insurance & security scale with value).
This is my first time replying in on a hackernews discussion so this formatting may be incorrect.