upvote
> there is simply not enough resources, land, high paying jobs for everyone to achieve a comfortable life

On the contrary, (in the US) I think there is at least enough land and resources (including food) that a modest haircut on the ultra-rich would go a long way for the lower-middle classes.

reply

  On the contrary, (in the US) I think there is at least enough land and resources (including food) that a modest haircut on the ultra-rich would go a long way for the lower-middle classes.
Yes but no high paying jobs in the middle of no where.
reply
If companies stop forcing RTO crap, then yes there are and will continue to be such jobs.
reply
Unfortunately, I think rto is here to stay
reply
> Society seems to be self correction mode by not having nearly as many babies recent years.

An interesting factoid from the Roman Empire is that in their later years there was a major fertility collapse to the point that various laws were passed in order to try to motivate fertility in various ways, and they ultimately failed.

I don't know what to take from that yet, if anything, but I think it's obvious that we've similarly entered well into an 'end of empire' type era, and fertility rates have also again collapsed. So again, I think it's simply interesting to ponder.

reply
It seems like population historically can overshoot productivity.
reply
> I often think about why this is happening now without invoking the default "evil rich people" hypothesis.

What do you mean? In the French protests, the "evil rich people" hypothesis is very present. Every other protester was brandishing "tax the rich" placards.

reply
Just thinking at a society/animalistic/human instincts/economics level.
reply
But the French are very "anti-rich people" (including "the rich" themselves: "champagne socialists" were invented here. Patent Pending (tm) (c) (r)).

So I really don't get your original point in this context.

reply