> At the very least the copy paster should read what the llm says, interpret it, fact check it, then write their own response.

then write their own response using an AI to improve the quality of the response? the implication here is that an AI user is going to do some research when using the AI was their research. to do the "fact check" as you suggest would mean doing actual work, and clearly that's not something the user is up for indicated by use of the AI.

so, to me, your suggestion is fantasy level thinking

I keep this link handy to send to such coworkers/people:

https://distantprovince.by/posts/its-rude-to-show-ai-output-...

I have a client who does this — pastes it into text messages! as if it will help me solve the problem they are asking me to solve — and I'm like "that's great I won't be reading it". You have to push back.