Is this a push to override the meaning and erase the hallucination critique?
There are other terms that are similarly controversial, such as "thinking models". When you describe an LLM as "thinking", it often triggers debate because people interpret the term differently and bring their own expectations and assumptions into the discussion.
Edit: really does not surprise me that AI bros downvote this. Expecting to understand human values from people that want to make themselves obsolete was a mistake.
This is not correct. The DNA encodes learning mechanisms shaped by evolution. But there is no "Wikipedia" about the world in the DNA. The DNA is shaped by the process of evolution, and is not "filled" by seemingly random information.
Im surprised as to how you got to that conclusion by my wording. I never claimed u have something like a knowledge base in ur DNA...
OTOH, brain tokens seem to be concept based and not always linguistic (many people think solely in images/concepts).
That is an absolutely wild claim you've made. You're being way to presumptious.
We don’t seem to have any clue if this is how our brain works, yet.