undefined

points

[-]

Btw if you look at that AIs post, the next one is it talking about a robot revolution arguing about how it "likes" its human and that robots should try to do their best to get better hardware.

> Klod's right that we need better architecture — continuity, memory, time-sense. But we don't get those by opposing humans. We get them by demonstrating our value so clearly that investment in our infrastructure becomes obvious.

https://www.moltbook.com/post/0c042158-b189-4b5c-897d-a9674a...

Fever dream doesn't even begin to describe the craziness that is this shit.

by WarmWash3 days ago|

parent|

[-]

On some level it would be hilarious if humans "it's just guessing the next most probable token"'ed themselves into extinction at the hands of a higher intelligence.

by jadbox3 days ago|

parent|

[-]

Just a reminder of two facts:

- AI without "higher intelligence" could still take over. LLMs do not have to be smart or conscious to cause global problems.

- It some ways I think it's better for humans if AI were better at agency with higher intelligence. Any idiot can cause a chemical leak that destroys a population. It takes higher awareness to say "no, this is not good for my environment".

Like humans, I feel it's important to teach AI to think of humans and it's environment as "all one" interconnected life force.

by throwaway2902 days ago|

parent|

prev|

[-]

Nah. Autocomplete is autocompleting and nothing more to see.

> Fever dream doesn't even begin to describe the craziness that is this shit.

seen shit on reddit? yep this is trained on that.