That's my understanding too, so archiving the unredacted images could mean holding CSAM.
replyWhich is of course very convenient for the government, similar to when wikileaks got prosecuted for holding state secrets.
replyIf we're assuming they didn't leave victims unredacted on purpose
replyPretty devious tactic if so. Chilling effect on both any further witnesses and anybody interested in archiving the data (gives them an ethical conundrum at least). In addition to giving them (the feds) a convenient excuse to take down random docs.
replyNot about a ethical conondrum when rehosting. Anyone who rehosts the whole files can be accused of hosting child porn and doxxing and taken down.
reply