It's also super easy not to use hard drugs, yet that's not a reason to stop restricting them.
replyIf something's harmful it should be controlled.
I find it pretty hypocritical that the same people who push for e.g. legal marijuana would go for banning social media apps. Don't get me wrong, I use neither and think both are mentally, physically, and morally corrosive. I would not care to have either present in the community where I live, nor for my future children to use them.
replyThat does not mean it is the province of the state to ban them.
To give them some credit, they support both positions because they were told to support them by the same people and never put much thought into it.
replyweed isn't designed to be addictive. You'll find most people would be cautious about legalising heroin, meth or crack.
replyWeed isn't designed to be anything, but it certainly is addictive in the same sense that social media is. There is no physical addiction (which is also true for TikTok), but there are definitely people that are hooked on it.
replyit is habit forming, but its not designed to be, by some of the brightest minds of a generation.
replydid you see what happened when we tried to decriminalise hard drugs in Vancouver? Feel good for yourself that you have the discipline to have self control, other do not and need help.
replyYou are free to not use TikTok yourself, no one is stopping you.
Also drug decriminalisation is very nuanced, I’m not 100% against it, I’m just pointing out just that open drug use spiked after.
> Also drug decriminalisation is very nuanced, I’m not 100% against it, I’m just pointing out just that open drug use spiked after.
replyWas that spike a true spike in new users, or existing users just coming out of the shadows?
Personal accountability is contrary to human nature.
replyWe are primates dominated by our primitive urges.