The criticism was directed at the company's product, not the employees...
replydeleted
replyThe response appears to be pointing out that with so many employees (engineers), it's unlikely that they all work on Windows.
replyMaybe. But interpreting it thus requires too much charitableness for it not to have been uncharitable, whether intentionally or otherwise.
replyAnd yet they still work for a company that has shown it isn’t overly concerned about quality or reliability in its products.
replyThaaat's capitalism
replyThey seem to be alienating a lot of their users right now in a lot of different products. There's a significant surge in open source software right now and Linux and all the people that are coming over are a bit more than usual. Their customer base seems tired of the game.
replyNot op, and I generally agree with your assumption but not for Microsoft, as I don't think it's limited to Windows:
replyTeams, Office (especially online), One Drive, SharePoint, Azure, GitHub, LinkedIn, all became very shitty and partially unusable with increasing number of weird bugs or problems lately.
This is not about individual employees. It’s in the nature of being an employee to be beholden to what’s incentivized by their company’s management and structure.
replyThe problems with Windows today have nothing to do with bugs but with the strategic vision of Nadella.
replydeleted
replyThis is also still small/unimportant enough not to be poisoned by their broken corporate culture.
reply