This assumes parents would vote in the interests of future adults. In my experience, parents are quite happy to vote against future adults, even their own. Housing policy is the most obvious example.
reply[flagged]
reply“invasion” is an unnecessarily emotive term. Legal immigrants are doing what is allowed by law, the country is able to change those laws if they wish.
replyAn invasion, or at the very least a replacement of the people and culture of a country being done legally does not mean it is not a problem. And giving more political power to the people who are coming in and outbreeding you will accelerate the timeline of the issue and weaken the power of the ones who can stop it. Policies related to birth rate need to be thought out very carefully as you can incentivize the wrong thing.
reply[flagged]
replyIs that a reference to one of the sources of the civil war in the US? Voting rights for disenfranchised (literally enslaved) people?
replyActually the US maintains a Senate and Electoral College because of slavery, and refuses to abolish them for (supposedly) any and every other reason. These systems allow whites in less populous states to exercise outsized power.
reply