It's not a peer review it's just AI slop. I do agree they don't seem to be intentionally posing as an MS employee.
replyLet's just say they are pretending to be helpful, how about that?
reply> "Peer review"
no unless your "peers" are bots who regurgitate LLM slop.
You think they lied about reproducing the issue? It’s useful to know if a bug can be reproduced.
replyWe cannot know for sure but I think it's reasonably likely (say 50/50). Regurgitating an LLM for 90% of your comment does not inspire trust.
replyYes, of course I think they lied, because a trustworthy person would never consider 0-effort regurgitated LLM boilerplate as a useful contribution to an issue thread. It's that simple.
replyIt's performative garbage: authority roleplay edition.
replyLet me slop an affirmative comment on this HIGH TRAFFIC issue so I get ENGAGEMENT on it and EYEBALLS on my vibed GitHub PROFILE and get STARS on my repos.