Are you serious? You don’t think I’m capable of running the codebase through an LLM? Or is this supposed to be some kind of gotchya? Rude and lame.
replyI'm not the OP.
replyNot everyone is paying for LLMs, even now. So I think it is perfectly reasonable to assume good intentions, here.
Someone spent their own tokens to ponder your code and thought they'd share the result. For anyone else looking, like me, I can see that this is probably going to come up relatively clean without having to spend my own tokens, or install it, and I'm more likely to, now that I can see that.
Turns out it was bad intentions, I respect the optimism though. And thanks for taking a look!
replyIgnore them. These people are insane, don't ruin your day reading their messages.
replyOh I'm ever so sorry -- because of course "I don’t want a codebase that looks like something out of a H.P. Lovecraft novel when I have to fix something in the future." is not at all rude and lame and you write perfect non-Lovecraftian code all day every day …
replyAm I reading this correctly? You got offended on behalf of LLMs because of some quip I made about how I choose to write code on my spare time?
replyThis is fascinatingly psychotic - but for your own good you might want to shut down the agents for a bit and take a walk.
Ah I see -- you're apparently one of these people who'll make snide judgemental remarks like It's not vibe coded. Sad that I have to make that qualification these days, but here we are. and I don’t want a codebase that looks like something out of a H.P. Lovecraft novel and then acts all non-plussed when someone should take issue with the judgemental attitude. And of course then straight in with the ad hominem This is fascinatingly psychotic. You're a totally normal and non-judgemental and even-keeled kind of person, aren't you?
reply