We're starting to have that convo in our org. This is just getting worse and worse for Github.
replyHosting .git is not that complicated of a problem in isolation.
No, but it has momentum left over from when it was much better. The Microsoft downslide will continue untill there's no one left
replyNot any longer. It used to but the outages have become very common. I am thinking about moving all my personal stuff to Codeberg.
replyYes, for personal projects I just self-host an instance of forgejo with dokploy. Everything else I deploy on codeberg, which is also an instance of forgejo.
replyIm using Bitbucket for years with no issues.
replyThe great advantage of Bitbucket is that it's so painfully slow you can't tell if it's down or not.
replyI love its UI (apart from its slowness, of course). I find it much cleaner than Gitlab's.
replyYou can self-host GitHub enterprise.
replyOoh - got a source?
replyself-host your own services. There are a lot of alternatives to GitHub.
replydeleted
replyIt always has been to just self host. Predicted GitHub's outage streak as far back as half a decade ago [0].
reply"A better way is to self host". [0]