upvote

points

by dude2507114 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby vessenes3 hours ago|
next
[-]
It's a benefit corp
reply
upvoteby xvector4 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
They've been very clear about their mission, they're doing more than anyone else when it comes to it, and if you've ever interviewed with them you'd know how critical it is to them.

But I guess it's easier to make a glib comment than look these things up.

reply
upvoteby lenerdenator4 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
Technically speaking, it's to maximize shareholder value while serving the public interest. They're a public benefit corporation.
reply
upvoteby longfacehorrace3 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
OpenAI has "open" in their name but is closed off to public access and input

Google used to have a motto "don't be evil"

Who enforces the definition of language? Who demands compliance?

Soon as we go down the path of policing and insistence on one true dogma, we veer into religious holy war type behavior.

Obsession with semantics of syntax is a sort of theism even if the syntax and semantics do not refer to the commonly accepted tropes of a specific religion.

reply
upvoteby lenerdenator2 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
In this case, it has to do with how they're classified under Delaware law as a corporate entity.

I'm not a lawyer (I don't even play one on TV, damn you Odenkirk) so I can't tell you what that means as far as case law for companies getting punished for behaving badly, but in this case, there is supposedly some sort of legal backing for the classification.

reply
upvoteby longfacehorrace52 minutes ago|
parent|
[-]
Laws are words with zero meaning if they go unenforced.

Politicians are not interested in assuring such.

Public is busy arguing semantics online; they are not interested in assuring such.

reply