upvote
I think we have rights to do lots of things that banning this business model would violate.
reply
I assume you're primarily referring to freedom of expression? I take the view that it doesn't include the freedom to pay people to carry a particular message so long as the restriction on paying is neutral as to the content of the message, but I can certainly respect the view that it does.

My comment about not having a right to business models is in some ways more general. Regardless of whether this business model is protected for some other reason, business models in general aren't, and it's a common flawed argument that they are.

reply
For Google, they figured out it's ads... So is it ok?
reply
Ostensibly not, if it is outlawed.
reply
Please, continue that "etc"...

Its been 30 years and no one has been able to continue that "etc".

reply
Of course they have. Off the top of my head examples include: Grants in the form of tax dollars (e.g. arxiv). To benefit the authors reputation (e.g. numerous scientists, developers, etc personal sites. zacklabe.com as a useful example). As a hobby (I think aiarena.net falls into this category). To collect data for research purposes (e.g. the original chatgpt release, and early recaptcha)...
reply
That works great when everyone has resources to pay for things online.

In practice, this cuts of 80% of the worlds population.

reply
Oh you mean we can reverse the eternal September? Sign me up! Gatekeeping is good, actually! The “let people enjoy things” crowd is responsibility for facilitating the mass enshittification of everything.

Catering to the lowest common denominator is how we got the Burger King guy on spirit airlines.

reply
Why are you commenting here instead of a website that gatekeeps commenters?
reply
"You criticize society, yet you participate in it".

I have and do pay for website access. That doesn't mean much if the current model flocks to no paid services.

reply