It's simply bizarre to claim that a blatantly partisan circuit court issuing capricious restrictions on their political opposition and having them vacated by SCOTUS is evidence of "the courts" erring to the contrary. The decision was overturned because the plaintiffs' case was a baseless fiction that the Biden administration was ever compelling those third parties to do anything, when in fact they simply used the same reporting mechanisms to alert the sites' operators of ToS violations as are available to any other user. The only example that case serves is of the most Republican-aligned circuit court consistently delivering garbage opinions to attack their party's opposition.