People here are making arguments about what should be. Either as interpretations or created laws.
replyWe all know that the actual interpretation is up to 5 republicans on the supreme court and whatever they feel on a given day will increase their side's power/ideology.
No one is going to be making arguments about that because there's no point, you can't logic someone out of a position that they didn't use logic to get to in the first place.
So again, when someone on a forum says "this is wrong and something should be done about it" replying that it might technically be legal at this moment in time is incredibly useless. It's completely missing the point.
> when someone on a forum says "this is wrong and something should be done about it"
replyIf that had been what was said, we wouldn’t even be here.
Perhaps we can work on what is called "media literacy" where we understand text based on its context and authorship and other such clues.
replyhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47025768
replyYou have the roles and responsibilities exactly backwards.
Well, my comments got more upvotes than yours did, and this is a democracy, so I guess I win?
replyYou can't see others' upvotes (at least, for net positive scores), so there's no way to know.
reply