In my experience, AI enables smart people to do their best work while automating zero-quality work like SEO spam that no humans should have been doing in the first place. I have yet to see anything that I would remotely call tragic.

> legal moats to protect their field

I wonder how do they hold up when there's a big enough benefit of using AI over human work. Like how are politicians to explain these moats to the masses when your AI doctor costs 10x less and according to a multitude of studies is much better at diagnosis?

Or in law? I've read China is pushing AI judges because people weren't happy with the impartiality of the human ones. I think in general people overestimate how much these legal moats are worth in the long run.