upvote

points

by yoavm11 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby yoz-y10 hours ago|
next
[-]
Not parent but: The first thing that pops to mind is inadvertently downloading and hosting CSAM.
reply
upvoteby yoavm10 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
If you suspect AA for spreading CSAM, please don't support the project. And please do share your reasons for suspicion.
reply
upvoteby RankingMember10 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
This isn't TOR, though it's not completely unfounded that the definition of CSAM could be broadened in the future by legislators to include things that are, by current definitions, not CSAM, e.g. works of fiction that include scenes of abuse.
reply
upvoteby randallsquared9 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Already happened in Australia, in a recent case.
reply
upvoteby reddalo8 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
I don't know the exact details, but that sounds dystopian.
reply
upvoteby Tepix10 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Yes, your copy of your operating system could also contain CSAM, I hope you checked every single byte just to make sure.
reply
upvoteby xpe10 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Please, let's be sensible and think about probabilities in the real world.
reply
upvoteby margalabargala9 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
I think they were just meeting the original commenter where they already were.
reply
upvoteby streetfighter6410 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
[flagged]
reply
upvoteby duozerk10 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
So you did use LLMs to write at least part of the software. I imagine you feel no shame, but it would be nice to at least mention it on the github page. It's a security risk.

As for your question, I don't know about the person you're replying to, but for me any software where part of the source was provided by a LLM is a no-go.

They're credible text generators, without any understanding of, well, anything really. Using them to generate source code, and then using it, is sheer insanity.

One might suggest it means I soon won't be able to use any software; fortunately the entire fever dream that is the ongoing "AI" bubble will soon stop, so I'm hoping that won't be the case.

reply
upvoteby satvikpendem10 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
They literally state that they used LLMs to build it in the second sentence of their initial comment so not sure why you frame it as something they weren't upfront about.

As for it being a bubble that will stop completely, that ship has long since sailed and I assume you're inadvertently using LLM generated code somewhere in your software stack already, due to news reports saying certain companies are already using LLMs in their codebase.

reply
upvoteby yoavm10 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
I wish I could speed up time just to see how this comment would age. While I personally prefer living in a world without LLMs, I do suspect you're going to end up without any software.
reply
upvoteby duozerk10 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
A more reasonable response than my admittedly slightly aggressive comment deserved.

Indeed, we'll see.

reply
upvoteby dylan6047 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
I'm imagining some apocalyptic world Mad Max style where there are underground groups hand writing code to avoid the detection of the AI. Unfortunately, so few people are able to do it any more and the code is so bug ridden that their attempts at regaining control over the AI often ends in embarrassing results. Those left in the fight often find themselves wondering why everyone just rolled over for the machines, what, because it made their lives easier??

Maybe it's a scene from a show I've seen already??

reply
upvoteby bigfishrunning8 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
I suspect we'll all end up without any software, once we've successfully gotten rid of anyone who can evaluate the output of an LLM
reply
upvoteby satvikpendem8 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
There will always be a niche of people writing software, just as today while most work in web dev or backend, there are some who work in embedded or have retro computing as a hobby.
reply