That's what Meta paid for.
replyThat’s exactly the lens they were hoping for
replyI guess so, I expected a little more nuance to hide it better. but it was just blatant. like any child could figure it out
replyPlenty of adults don't catch it either. You don't need to be blatant. Dress it up in neutral business language, keep the arguments one step removed from the conclusion, and anchor it in assumptions people already hold about markets and American institutions. Then it's nearly impossible to push back on without sounding like you're attacking the premises.
replyThe journalistic version of the “I’m kidnapped” hand signal.
replyThat’s what the WSJ is there for
reply[dead]
reply