Well, that's an odd idea of "can be replaced".
reply> editors can remove Archive.today links when the original source is still online and has identical content
Hopeless. Just begs for alteration.
> a different archive site, like the Internet Archive,
Hopeless. It allows archive tampering by the page's own JS and archive deletion by the domain owner.
> Ghostarchive, or Megalodon
Hopeless. Coverage is insignificant.
> archive.today
replyHopeless. Caught tampering the archive.
The whole situation is not great.
deleted
replyI just quoted the very next paragraph after the sentence you quoted and asked for clarification.
replyI did so. You're welcome.
As for the rest, take it up with Jimmy Wiles, not me.
aka Jimbo Wales
replyThanks for the correction. I can't type the letter 'a'[0].
reply