upvote

points

by Icathian5 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby NinjaTrance5 hours ago|
next
[-]
Engineers have been vibe coding a lot recently...
reply
upvoteby jsheard5 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
The featured blog post where one of their senior engineering PMs presented an allegedly "production grade" Matrix implementation, in which authentication was stubbed out as a TODO, says it all really. I'm glad a quarter of the internet is in such responsible hands.
reply
upvoteby gtowey3 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
It's spreading and only going to get worse.

Management thinks AI tools should make everyone 10x as productive, so they're all trying to run lean teams and load up the remaining engineers with all the work. This will end about as well as the great offshoring of the early 2000s.

reply
upvoteby blibble4 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
there was also a post here where an engineer was parading around a vibe-coded oauth library he'd made as a demonstration of how great LLMs were

at which point the CVEs started to fly in

reply
upvoteby ranger_danger2 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
Matrix doesn't actually define how one should do authentication though... every homeserver software is free to implement it however they want.
reply
upvoteby Arathorn44 minutes ago|
parent|
[-]
the main bit of auth which was left unimplemented on matrix-workers was the critical logic which authorizes traffic over federation: https://spec.matrix.org/latest/server-server-api/#authorizat...

Auth for clients is also specified in the spec - there is some scope for homeservers to freestyle, but nowadays they have to implement OIDC: https://spec.matrix.org/latest/client-server-api/#client-aut...

reply
upvoteby dana3215 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Thats a classic claude move, even the new sonnet 4.6 still does this.
reply
upvoteby bonesss4 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
It’s almost as classic as just short circuiting tests in lightly obfuscated ways.

I could be quite the kernel developer if making the test green was the only criteria.

reply
upvoteby brutalc4 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
[dead]
reply
upvoteby dakiol4 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
No joke. In my company we "sabotaged" the AI initiative led by the CTO. We used LLMs to deliver features as requested by the CTO, but we introduced a couple of bugs here and there (intentionally). As a result, the quarter ended up with more time allocated to fix bugs and tons of customer claims. The CTO is now undoing his initiative. We all have now some time more to keep our jobs.
reply
upvoteby samrus4 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
Thats actively malicious. I understand not going out of your way to catch the LLMs' bugs so as to show the folly of the initiative, but actively sabotaging it is legitimately dangerous behavior. Its acting in bad faith. And i say this as someone who would mostly oppose such an initiative myself

I would go so far as to say that you shouldnt be employed in the industry. Malicious actors like you will contribute to an erosion of trust thatll make everything worse

reply
upvoteby sp00chy4 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
Might be but sometimes you don’t have another choice when employers are enforcing AIs which have no „feeling“ for context of all business processes involved created by human workers in the years before. Those who spent a lot of love and energy for them mostly. And who are now forced to work against an inferior but overpowered workforce.

Don’t stop sabotaging AI efforts.

reply
upvoteby tovej2 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Forcing developers to use unsafe LLM tools is also malicious. This is completely ethical to me. Not commenting on legality.
reply
upvoteby renegade-otter3 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
I see someone is not familiar with the joys of the current job market.
reply
upvoteby hypeatei4 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
That's extremely unethical. You're being paid to do something and you deliberately broke it which not only cost your employer additional time and money, but it also cost your customers time and money. If I were you, I'd probably just quit and find another profession.
reply
upvoteby logicchains4 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
That's not "sabotaged", that's sabotaged, if you intentionally introduced the bugs. Be very careful admitting something like that publicly unless you're absolutely completely sure nobody could map your HN username to your real identity.
reply
upvoteby Ylpertnodi4 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
Typo: "shop", should have been with an 'el'.

(: phonetically, because 'l's are hard to read.

reply