There's positives and negatives to each. For government domain seizure, there's due process involved but working around it is harder (the service provider either has to acquire a new proper domain or onion domain, then disseminate it to the audience somehow). For ISP level blocking there's limited due process (at least in the cited case of LaLiga seemingly just issuing a complaint to the ISP), but the audience can easily work around with it with a VPN or sometimes just an alternate DNS server.
replyISP level blocking is for the mainstream, anyone slightly tech literate can overcome it.
replyThe domain seizure, forced service shut downs like app store distribution ban or payment processing ban or forcing hosting providers not to serve you and physically taking you into custody for spreading unlicensed content is the real deal and it’s actually effective.
Though even if there is a way to circumvent, if there is no audience or ad revenues, there is no motivation. Look at Twitch streamers or YouTubers who are banned:
reply -> No revenue
-> No audience
-> No reason to continue
-> "Problem" solved> not Spain as the government but LaLiga(a sports organization) abused its given powers and apparently demanded that ISPs block the site.
replyWhy do you keep arguing a point you were wrong about
reply