upvote

points

by zenbowman10 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby logifail10 hours ago|
next
[-]
> At this point the harms to children from social media use are very well documented

Our middle child (aged 12) has an Android phone, but it has Family Link on it.

Nominally he gets 60 mins of phone time per day, but he rarely even comes close to that, according to Family Link he used it for a total of 17 minutes yesterday. One comes to the conclusion that with no social media apps, the phone just isn't that attractive.

He seems to spend most of his spare time reading or playing sports...

reply
upvoteby edgyquant10 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
I commend this but I always try to think about the arguments for something like cigarettes. People didn’t buy the argument that parents need to be preventing their kids from smoking
reply
upvoteby zobzu10 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
most kids dont have parents who care to that degree.
reply
upvoteby logifail10 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
As part of the unofficial bargain in which we limit screen time I get to spend a big chunk of my spare time driving him (and his siblings) to and from various sports fixtures.

Just one of the many joys of parenting :)

reply
upvoteby meowface10 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
We need to destroy privacy and anonymity online for the noble goal of the government banning teenagers from looking at Twitter and Instagram?

If it's a concern, parents can prevent or limit their children's use. If all this were being done to prevent consistent successful terrorist attacks in the US with tens of thousands of annual casualties, I'd say okay maybe there is an unavoidable trade-off that must be made here, but this is so absurd.

reply
upvoteby edgyquant10 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
It isn’t just about teenagers though I think I outlined that? We need to make sure people online are real people and yes we should prevent kids from being exposed to algorithms designed to addict then.
reply
upvoteby meowface8 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Adults are nearly as susceptible to such addiction. If this is the goal then the actual legislation should be to prohibit social media companies from doing it to anyone. (I think this would be government overreach and a possible first amendment violation, though. I say this as a center-left person who deeply hates what Musk has done to Twitter. I would even describe myself as an anti-free speech person; I just respect the nation's laws and the principle that the state should not be able to imprison you just for speech.)
reply
upvoteby modo_mario10 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
Do you genuinely believe the major tech companies and gov reps actually want to close their addiction revenue taps?
reply