upvote
> Nobody gets a house or a job at Microsoft for buying Microsoft...

This is the same Microsoft we're talking about right?

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/microsoft-pays-25-million-end...

https://techcentral.co.za/eoh-microsoft-ensnared-in-sec-corr...

https://www.wsj.com/tech/former-microsoft-employee-alleges-b...

Any fines that allow profitable operations are no more than a tax.

reply
This is the same comment we’re referring to right? The one that said that MS gets contracts because they buy houses and cars or give jobs to the people deciding where the contract goes?

That’s someone who read a couple of articles on corruption and just extrapolated to “all of it must be the same”.

reply
I can't quote examples for obvious reasons.

Since you quoted Microsoft, remember this? https://www.dhs.gov/archive/news/2024/04/02/cyber-safety-rev... you have other companies that have a much better track record on Security.

If you browse HN everyday, at least once a weak, you'll see security issues related to Azure and Microsoft product, to the point that Microsoft stopped bounty programs or don't include some products.

reply
If you want to establish a pattern or rule you’ll need way more than one example you can’t give.

Is Google’s search engine used just because they give money to those who do? Because they pay Apple and Mozilla. Just set Google as default and the check’s in the mail right?

The last paragraph was obviously a diss at MS for costing a lot in support and having shitty security. Anyone with first hand experience (as opposed to hearing the stories) with MS contracts and heard the justifications again and again doesn’t need the joke explained.

reply
>A lot of good it is that you have Google Meet and Libre Office when the partners you work closes to have Teams and MS Office

Which is why governments in the EU need to lead this change to open source so others can point and say "hey even the big guys use it now".

reply