upvote
Yeah; there's absolutely no way he could possibly support philanthropic efforts in one state from another. Nope; everyone now loses out because of it!

There is absolutely 0 reason that someone worth $270 billion needs to worry about the 5% tax. The 5% tax will reduce his estimated worth by $13.5B bringing him to a paltry $256.5B.

To put $256.5B in perspective: over two /lifetimes/, he would need to spend around $4.5MM a day to exhaust that number, assuming it did not grow exponentially over that same time.

reply
1. The tax could cause him to sell equity he doesn't want to. It's not like he has $270B in a checking account.

2. If they do it once then why not again next year? Maybe next time it's for only $100 million or $10 million or $1 million. Eventually everyone is paying 5% of their wealth every year. Why not? That's how we got the current income tax.

3. It's the principle. Resisting these efforts sends a signal that they aren't a good idea.

4. Do we really think the money is better off in control of the incompetent CA government than invested in private enterprise or donated to charity? I don't see how it's better for it to line Newsom's Swiss bank account.

reply
It’s supposedly a one-time tax; but, you’re right; who knows what they’ll do.

But his net worth has effectively more than doubled in 1y. I think he’ll be just fine.

reply
> The tax could cause him to sell equity he doesn't want to. It's not like he has $270B in a checking account.

How annual income should return more than that if he can do anything at all.

reply
According to later replies on X it's based on voting control percentage for dual class shares, so it's 40% tax, not 5%. So more than $100 billion.
reply