upvote
reply
Apologies, I meant federally.

Since D's control California, no need to work with R's there.

I also think they could get creative. Eg., without an attestation validated by <agency> products can't be sold.

For example, this is already done with controlled substances and food.

reply
I don't think it's unreasonable for indirect impacts like this to be regulated by the federal government.
reply
I completely agree. I'd vote that person regardless of party.
reply