https://gotosocial.org/
replyOut of ethical disagreement they switched completely to codeberg. And they are certainly not the only ones, given signaling on the fediverse by other EU citizens.
> any project important enough to matter will have at least a GitHub mirror
replyThat might be true, but many of the mirrors are unofficial.
Noted in the abstract, thanks. Concrete examples more useful ofc.
replyConcrete examples: GNU software, musl C library, everything from x.org and freedesktop.org. Just have a look at the top 1,000 projects from the Debian popularity contest and you'll find many projects outside the Github bubble. Why not use the Debian package name in your nomination form instead of a Github URL? Any project important enough to matter will have a Debian package, right?
replyIf you're trying to come up with something like the "criticality score" based on repo metadata like the OpenSSF, you're likely to fail just like they did. Starting with Debian's popcon data makes a lot more sense, in my opinion.
Thanks, captured here: https://github.com/osendowment/endowment.dev/issues/34#issue...
replyThey haven't pulled the plug on github yet, but my understanding is that Gentoo intends to drop it long term. In general, I would expect any of the projects that leave GH because they want to avoid being used to train AI would avoid leaving even a mirror behind (since that would defeat the point). (This is not intended as a value judgement, just saying that there exist projects that are doing this)
replyThanks, noted at https://github.com/osendowment/endowment.dev/issues/34#issue...
reply