upvote
It doesn't necessarily have to be advertisers paying AI providers. It could be advertisers working to ensure they get recommended by the latest models. The next form of SEO.
reply
That's called LLM SEO now I believe.
reply
I'm curious if there's any hard data on how LLM SEO compares to traditional SEO.

My gut tells me that LLM SEO will be harder to game than traditional SEO.

reply
There are competing terms currently being decided on by the market at large: AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) and GEO (Generative Engine Optimization)

Candidly I am working on a startup in this space myself, though we are taking a different angle than most incumbents.

While it's still early days for the space, I sense a lot of the original entrants who focus on, essentially, 'generate more content ideally with our paid tools' will run in to challenges as the general population has a pretty negative perception of 'AI Slop.' Doubly so when making purchasing decisions, hence the rise of influencers and popularity of reviews (though those are also in danger of sloppification).

There's an inevitable GIGO scenario if left unchecked IMO.

reply
> data on the equivalent of “ad impressions”.

1. They can skip impressions and go right to collect affiliate fees. 2. Yes, the ad has to be labeled or disclosed... but if some agent does it and no one sees it, is it really an ad.

So much to work out.

reply
How would it be paid for?
reply
Maybe. Historically lots of ads had little to no stats and those ads were wildly more effective than anything we have today.
reply