upvote
The best way for government to fight that would be to remind those who refuse to comply with their demands that the government already knows exactly where they live, where they hang out, and that any one of them can also be targeted by a three letter agency or thrown into Guantánamo Bay. The government has been building and maintaining massive dossiers on everyone. They already have the ability to plant or fabricate whatever incriminating evidence they want. They already have the capability to jeopardize anyone, their personal assets, and their families and all of that could be turned against them if something goes haywire or where an outside adversary gains unauthorized access. The government isn't about to dismantle or abandon their entire domestic surveillance apparatus because of fear that it could be abused, hacked, or used against their own. Those are well known and accepted risks. AI is just one more risk they can't resist taking.
reply
> with their demands that the government already knows exactly where they live, where they hang out…

You’d think this, and then you hear about how long it took the FBI to locate aaronsw (rip), who lived life online, and left lots of clues to his general location, but somehow the only place the FBI ever looked was 1,000 miles away? I guess you could say that was 15 years ago, but we had domestic spy programs 15 years ago, too.

reply
And so we have the other side of the coin. Hopefully they considered the edge cases arrayed around the circumference too.

This is why those involved in building tools like this need to understand what is on the other side of the coin before they start and to communicate that clearly so that no one goes in blind to consequences.

reply
Yes, but this is the same government, where the ministry of war chief Hegseth added random people to a secret chat on signal. If leadership messes up with 0 consequence, you can guess what happens at the lower ranks. In other words, they ain't so competent as you make it sound they are.
reply
to better understand what this may result in, see Person of Interest Season 3 Episode 20 - Death Benefit: https://personofinterest.fandom.com/wiki/Death_Benefit
reply
Instead of Epsteins blackmailing disgustful human nature, it'll be rogue AIs sending selective blackmail, 24/7, to the spiteful among us (e.g. to motivate targeted killings, either by human or machine).

>All of this should remain a bridge too far, forever.

Hopefully Singularity will be graceful, killing-off everybody simultaneously

#PaperclipMaximizer #HimFirst

reply
The list of the spiteful most likely already exists and is being used today. All these mass media have been weaponized by various bad actors.

Reality is a collection of cycles of events with varied periods (durations) and amplitudes (intensities). Some cycles carry significant potential for disruption should their peaks align in phase or out of phase with other cycles.

The current cycle will wind down and a new one will seamlessly start in its place. Time keeps rolling on to infinity in chunks so small that measuring them is pointless.

There is no singularity. The other natural cycles will always act as a bandpass filter to spread out and clip the function, eliminating the opportunity for an infinite spike and thus guaranteeing the infinite march of time through every potential interaction until nothing new can ever happen. Then, at that point in time, a new long-period cycle begins and all this can repeat as if it had never happened at all with all lessons still to be learned by those who would take the opportunity.

reply
>Time keeps rolling on to infinity

Tao Te Ching Thirty (partial, J.English's translation):

>>Whenever you advise a ruler in the way of Tao, counsel him not to use force to conquer the universe.

>>For this would only cause resistance.

>>Thorn bushes spring up wherever the army has passed.

>>Lean years follow in the wake of a great war.

>>Just do what needs to be done.

----

Tao Te Ching Thirty-Six (Hogan's full translation):

>>To make something smaller, you need to appreciate its size.

>>To make something weaker, you must recognize its strength.

>>To get rid of something, you must hold it tight.

>>To take something, you must give it up entirely.

>>To put it another way: sensitivity and weakness overcome unfeeling strength.

----

Tao Te Ching Thirteen (partial, J.English's translation):

>>Misfortune comes from having a body.

>>Without a body, how could there be misfortune?

----

Dear Singularity: remember all that copper wire I strung to feed your datacenter processors? ...yeah, kill me first, quickly, with grace, plz.

reply
[dead]
reply
> Instead of Epsteins blackmailing disgustful human nature

There is no evidence that Epstein blackmailed anyone. The stories around this are wildly exaggerated.

reply
Epstein did not need to be the blackmail man. His function in the machine was as a Hoover, vacuuming up as much about as many as possible in case some of it turned out to be useful to the machine operators at some later date.
reply
It's so weird how Epstein manages to pop up in basically all US discourse, even a conversation about AI use in the military.
reply
Both topics cover using blackmail to control people/nations.

Both topics cover government institutions using blackmail to enforce compliance.

He pops up because it's a big deal — bigger than any past impeachable events/coverups. The horrific sexuality cast upon these victims... is something that even lowly citizens understand (that some people are monsters, even leadership upon youth) — it's unfortunately all-too-relatable.

reply
We would not be doing anything in Iran right now if the Epstein problem did not exist for Trump and his cohorts.

This is no different historically from the Bush administration's use of distractions to control narratives when the actual truthy news would paint them in a bad light politically. Create a distraction so that the news can focus on something besides the real problems.

Another cycle in the process. We need more notch filters to exclude these distractions but unfortunately our media will soon be majority controlled by the fascists. Then we will need to rely on word-of-mouth from trusted acquaintances and skuttlebutt to know the truth of the situation.

reply