> However i would say that yes, humanitarian intervention is one of the only non self-defense justifications for war that anyone has ever accepted in the post-ww2 era
replySo when is the US intervening in Ukraine then? Russia is literally doing human safari with drones hunting down civilians in Kherson.
> So when is the US intervening in Ukraine then?
replyDid you miss the absolute massive amounts of aid US has given ukraine?
Regardless, there is a difference between how war is justified and why wars actually take place.
> Did you miss the absolute massive amounts of aid US has given ukraine?
replyI missed US bombing Moscow, like they are bombing Tehran at this moment.
But this will undoubtedly increase the general level of adversarial feelings and justifications of violence worldwide for many decades to come. The seeds of the next ISIS were planted today
replyCan the US or Israel morally claim “humanitarian” intervention given what’s happening in parallel in Gaza? If Iran bombed Tel Aviv would you call it a humanitarian intervention? Is this a creative use of the term? When you make a “humanitarian” intervention to save some humans, while decimating others it sounds like you think the “others” are not/sub-humans.
replyTu quoque
replySo I suppose you'll be attacking Saudi Arabia after this if you're so worried about humanitarian conditions?
replyYou have to pick your battles and be pragmatic. Changing the Iranian regime would have a much broader impact than changing the Saudi Arabian one.
replyBombs for peace.
reply