upvote

points

by spongebobstoes7 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby mpalmer7 hours ago|
[-]
> supply chain risk is not a negotiating tool. it's spite after talks have ended.

No. It's unlawful abuse of power.

> the miltary prefers boundaries to be technical, not contractual

That's nice for the military. Meanwhile, Anthropic has the right to refuse the use of its IP without being subject to punishment by the government.

You seem to me to be irretrievably "deal-brained", and not at all concerned about the obvious abuse of power by the government here, or the constant display of bad faith by gov't officials.

reply
upvoteby spongebobstoes54 minutes ago|
parent|
next
[-]
I am comparing the oai and anthropic deals. most of your comment isn't on that topic

if you believe the government acts in bad faith and is untrustworthy, why trust them to not violate the terms of a contract?

technical safeguards are more secure. the oai deal seems better

reply
upvoteby Imustaskforhelp5 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Adding more to this, IIRC US Govt threatened to invoke laws which have never been used against an American company in the entire history of US over two conditions that were:

1. No global surveillance on citizens

2. No autonomous killing machines (essentially)

That was it, Anthropic was fine with everything else but they couldn't (in their conscience?) agree to these two things and just these two very reasonable demands caused the govt. to spiral so bad.

reply