upvote
Only Congress can change the name of a federal department, so the Department of Defense is still properly called that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_14347

reply
Only Congress can declare war but here we are with the department of war bombing a foreign country and capturing and assassinating foreign leaders.
reply
That policy changed a long time ago. The last declaration of war was June 4, 1942.

After Vietnam, Congress passed the War Powers Resolution to limit the ability of Presidents to conduct military action without Congressional approval, but it still allows military action for up to 60 days. Every President since then has used that power.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Powers_Resolution

reply
That 60 day limit was ignored so frequently in the past it might as well not exist.

Pretty much every attempt at stopping the president (from Clinton onwards) ends the same way: house votes on it, senate might agree with the slimmest of majority, it reaches the president's desk, president vetoes it, it goes back to the senate where it needs 2/3 majority to overthrow the veto, and it never gets that 2/3 majority.

reply
Yep, it’s a case of are they willing to impeach the president over this. And the answer is likely no. Some of the America first lot might vote against on ‘How does this help America’ grounds but I don’t see them getting near the threshold.
reply
So the president can wage war without the Congress, but it can't officially rename the department that supports these wars autocratically. That's interesting.
reply
deleted
reply
Even your link doesn't say what you imply.

> It provides that the president can send the U.S. Armed Forces into action abroad only by Congress's "statutory authorization", or in case of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces".

There was not at attack on the United States.

reply
I don't know why we're getting mired in the details here. The administration certainly isn't. We all work for trump now. Lawyers, journalists, universities, tech companies, state, local and foreign governments. Anything trump or one of his designated people wants, you need to do. If you start sputtering about your agency or your rights or your sovereignty, then expect as much shit thrown at you as the trump organization can muster. That's it, there is no legal justification. There are no fine points to argue. Obey or be punished.
reply
The point is that someone claimed the law was changed, and then linked to something that didn't support the claim.

Yes, Trump is ignoring the law, but you have to be aware that he is crossing the line rather than gas lighting that there wasn't a line at all.

reply
Iraq war was the last declared war. Afghanistan war was also declared.
reply
Incorrect. The only times America has formally declared war were the War of 1812, the Mexican-American War, the Spanish-American War, World War I, and World War II.

In the case of the Barbary Wars, Vietnam War, the Iraq War and War on Terror / Afghanistan War, etc... congress approved military engagement but DID NOT issue a formal Declaration of War.

reply
You mean that they were special military operations? j/k

Interesting though, I never knew this.

reply
That part isn't sited. It is likely not true.
reply
The EO itself agrees with this and says that the War title is secondary. It explicitly doesn’t truly rename the department.
reply
'Power is the perception of power'
reply
The Department of Defense was established by the National Security Act of 1947. If the Congress wanted to change the name then they would pass another law to do so.

An executive order is not law.

reply
Even though the the DoD was created via an act of Congress, as POTUS is the head of the Executive Branch and the CiC of the armed forces, could you make an argument that a name change can be done by executive order? (setting aside whether or not the new proposed name is stupid)
reply
And when it was created it was DOW.
reply
because most americans do not want war, at least id hope, so calling it that seems pretty short sited (maybe until you continually do that 'war' thing), if you want the citizens to look positively on your spending it should probably be for defense not war, again, at least i should hope. im just a dumb "lib" whatever that means
reply
On the other hand calling it "Department of Defense" seems quite whitewashing of what it actually does.
reply
It spends the defence budget...
reply
Which is used primarily for offense anyway
reply
I'm pretty sure the amount the money spent on offensive actions is significantly less than the defense
reply
When was America last invaded by a foreign adversary?
reply
This resembles anti-vax logic. We haven’t been invaded because our military maintains a strong deterrence and strategic depth.
reply
Yeah, otherwise the USA would have been invaded by Cuba, Iraq, Vietnam, Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen and a hundred more, and they all would have a fight over who can have it. Thank god the US defended themselves against those terrible guys. Especially the WMDs were quite the close call, the Iraqis were minutes away from nuking the land of the mart.
reply
> otherwise the USA would have been invaded

Yes, invading Hawaii was part of imperial Japanese planning. If you don’t understand that defense spending is still worthwhile even if you don’t blow anything up with it, I’m not sure how we connect.

reply
deleted
reply
Maybe.

I was just saying that the purpose of the Department of Defence is to spend the "defence budget".

reply
Gulf of Mexico.
reply
>Why DoD and not DoW?

Reddit/Bluesky brigade is in full force here, that's why

reply
deleted
reply
DOW was already taken, and that is the one to watch when it all comes crashing down?
reply
Perhaps because the latter sounds hilariously childish?
reply
Actually that was the original name. And it was a more honest name.
reply
It's always been the MoD in the UK afaik, but there was the War Office I suppose.
reply
It was the War Office from 1857 to the mid 60s.
reply
law of triviality on full display
reply
deleted
reply
[flagged]
reply
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_De...

Stoping and questioning why somebody uses DoD or DoW is way more telling than using any of those. Especially that both are perfectly fine, even officially.

A square was renamed in my home city about 20 years ago. We still use the original one usually, even teens know that name. I use a form of the original name of our main stadium which was renamed almost 30 years ago. Heck, some people use names of streets which are not official for almost 40 years now. Btw, the same with departments of the government. Nobody follows how they called at the moment, because nobody really cares. That’s the strange when somebody cares.

reply
Or it could have just been a genuine question. I'm not American and I've seen DoW used in newspapers and thought the name change was official. Personally I've thought it a more apt and honest name for what they do.

But the backlash in the commments here show how ideologically charged the question seem to be.

reply
> Or it could have just been a genuine question.

Yes, exactly that’s why I wrote several examples to support why the chance for that is very-very slim.

reply
Easier to work in hypotheticals than to do a bit of research like read the other comments. Just explained it was an honest question and why.
reply
Do you really trust in random comments on the internet which states something to which the possibility is slim, because literally nobody cares why somebody calls the way it is, when that somebody knows both names, and when it's not political? I don't think that's optimal, and it's a hefty understatement of course.
reply
I wasn't aware of how ideologically charged the question was. I'm also not American, but I'm glad I made the question. It's a clear sign for us not Americans to just leave them be.
reply
> It's a clear sign for us not Americans to just leave them be.

Depending on where you live in the world that might be quite hard to do soon.

reply
I agree. I live in Brazil and even though tariffs and interventions weren't directed at us, they influence the economy and political decisions. Also, Venezuela is right next to us, so instabilities there do tend to affect the whole region.
reply
By using the actual legal and official name of the department (which Trump didn’t and couldn’t change)?
reply
Because using DoW is woke when the legal name is DoD.

Pretty ironic given their anti-woke agenda

reply