No need to be confused, the opening paragraphs explain the discrepancy
reply> Unfortunately, the rest of the interviews from that event have never seen the light of day - until now!
replyNot really -- It invites speculation as to why they were not published for 9 years. And, are the words spoken a decade ago still valid?
They weren't published because the person who interviewed everyone is now the project maintainer, and ran out of time to do transcriptions. :)
replyI volunteered to help with transcription, so I was given several audio recordings and started working on them. The first "resurfaced" one was Simon Budig: https://www.gimp.org/news/2025/11/01/simon-budig-interview-w...
There's about 4 more from another event which I'll be working on between coding and other things. There's definitely some material that's a bit dated (for instance, the comment about non-destructive editing), but I think it's still interesting insight into development.
Sure, but it explains the dates. Which is all that you originality highlighted as your confusion. Perhaps you can query them directly about your other curiosities?
replyI think the interview is interesting regardless if some of the details within are dated or not.