upvote
Im still struggling with understanding when MCP works better. I move everything to cli after a while. Can you give me more concrete examples? Because I don’t doubt you, I just don’t understand.
reply
Most APIs and CLIs are not setup with clear separation of permissions, and when they have those permissions are mostly designed around human access patterns and risks, not LLM ones. The primary example of course being read-only vs write access.

MCPs have provided any easy way to side-step that baggage.

e.g. in an MCP, you have tools, those tools are usually binned into "read" vs "write". Given that, I can easily configure my tooling to give an LLM (e.g. Claude Code) unlimited read access to some system (by allowing all read-only tools) without likewise giving the LLM write/destructive access.

Obviously you can design APIs/CLIs with this in mind, but up until now that has not been a primary concern so they haven't.

reply
It's the security layer that I'm most interested with MCPs. Granting full access to the CLI feels super dangerous and maybe there are options to certain commands that I want to restrict from LLM usage.
reply