upvote
Taking inflation into account, a $599 iPhone in 2026 would have been $380 in 2007. Given that the actual launch price in 2007 was $499, that's a pretty hefty drop.
reply
$499 with carrier subsidy too
reply
It didn't take much longer to get a 3G for that price with no subsidy.
reply
A technology doodad getting 25% cheaper in real terms over 15-20 years is about as far opposite as you can get from a hefty price drop.
reply
Sure, it hasn’t crashed like the prices of televisions, or like computers did in the 80s and 90s. But it’s still meaningfully cheaper and of course much more capable (the original iPhone didn’t even launch with an App Store!).
reply
Come on, the iPhone had:

  - no app store
  - no video recording at all
  - no copy/paste function
  - no selfie camera
  - no GPS
Just to name a few. I won't even go into things like touch/faceID, wireless charging, iCloud, any form of water resistance etc.

And then in terms of the specs on what it did have that got better, processor, memory, storage, screen quality, battery life, camera, it's all orders of magnitude better. There really is no comparison.

I mean look at the price of a digital camera, music player etc, hell even external battery pack in 2007, with the same specs as the iPhone today, and you'll easily find support for using the words 'hefty price drop'.

reply
It's also 10000% more capable too.
reply
And OP wants a model that's somewhat less than a 10000% improvement.
reply
> feels like they're setting whatever price they can get away with.

This is just a free market for any product works. No?

Why do software engineers ask for six digit salaries? Because they can get away with it — someone is willing to pay for it.

reply
You asked for it. Now sit back and relish the ripe comments from fruitopologists.
reply
There is no market for it in US at least since carriers control that selling couple year old iphones for free or close to it.
reply
I’m pretty sure they determine the price upfront and then figure out what bells and whistles they can ship without eating into their margins. Their goal is to hit a certain average selling price across their massive user base when they upgrade their old phones. They are not going to jeopardize that by releasing an attractive cheap iPhone.

For the people who really don’t want to spend a lot, obviously the easiest option is to just buy an older iPhone or keep your phone for longer. My partner doesn’t care about having the latest tech. So first I use a phone for 3 years and then they use it for another 3 years. We essentially get 6 years of life out of it (Apple is good about releasing software updates for 6 years).

reply
It's a luxury brand. You don't sell cheap and risk losing the people that are happy to pay $1400 for a new iPhone.
reply
It’s not a luxury brand, it is a quality brand. There is a difference.
reply
The keyboard-doesn't-trigger-the-tapped-key-sometimes brand, just awestruck at their quality https://ios-countdown.win/
reply
> It’s not a luxury brand, it is a quality brand. There is a difference.

It’s an attainable luxury brand. There aren’t many products that a high school kid has in common with billionaires, superstar athletes and movie stars—the iPhone is such a product.

reply
So is Mercedes-Benz. But they don't sell a $20,000 commuter car.
reply
No, Mercedes Benz is definitely a luxury brand. They don’t want to sell to everyone. Apple (Steve Jobs) has explicitly stated that as one of their goals.
reply
It’s not a quality brand, it is a luxury brand. There is a difference.
reply
reply
>aimed at producing Smart-badged cars

The brand is "Smart".

reply
Toyota is a quality brand, Mercedes is a luxury brand.
reply
Mercedes-Benz sells commuter cars in Europe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_A-Class

reply
> The Mercedes-Benz A-Class is a car manufactured by German luxury automaker Mercedes-Benz

"luxury" is more of a marketing and product positioning term, it doesn't really have anything to do with engineering or quality practicalities

reply
And this is the Mercedes-Benz commuter car I want to see more of.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_Citaro

reply
At least they increased the base storage to 256GB
reply
I'd argue that is worth the money if you're going to be using a phone every single day of their life. People will drop a few hundred on fancy shoes and wear them once a month, but they treat phones as cheap commodities.
reply
The iPhone SE was only $400.
reply
Last time I complained about the pricing of the iPhone, people pointed out that inflation included the prices wasn't to far of from the original iPhone.

Still, I don't care that the phones are faster, have larger screens, better camera, FaceID, AI, are thinner light and what have you. The iPhone design peaked in 2015, from there they could just have release the same phone year after year, making it cheaper and cheaper and I'd still be happy with it.

The prices are, in my mind insane, and I'll be buying used, but those are also overpriced.

reply
> Still, I don't care that the phones are faster, have larger screens, better camera, FaceID, AI, are thinner light and what have you. The iPhone design peaked in 2015, from there they could just have release the same phone year after year, making it cheaper and cheaper and I'd still be happy with it.

This obviously isnt relevant generally though, this is not how the general public feels at all.

reply
No, they couldn’t, because then the company would stop existing due to lack of sales.
reply
Bell System released about 10 models over 110 years, worked out just fine for them.
reply
Yeah, because it had a government-sanctioned monopoly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingsbury_Commitment

reply
And now you see why they want to grow their services business so badly
reply
The first SE in 2016, which wasn’t very far from flagship at the time, was only $399. It was a steal.
reply
Accounting for inflation, that's $542. And considering how much everything, including phones, costs nowadays, $600 seems like a steal to me too. I was expecting a much higher price for what I'm seeing on that page.
reply
deleted
reply
Can mess up the price ladder!
reply
Because they know people will pay it.
reply
Global crazy tariffs, supply chain issues, and RAM and storage shortages due to AI hype betting. Also greed.
reply