undefined

points

[-]

Me too, but I’m going to have to upgrade. The lack of storage on my phone (64GB) is killing me - every time there is an os update I have to delete almost everything to make room

by rubee646 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

Same. Home button is sooo much better than swiping gestures

by bubblewand3 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

The physical home button is, no bullshit, one of the greatest pieces of UI ever. No, I am not kidding, I really think that. It’s crazy to me that they abandoned it, the gestures that replace its functionality are overall-worse and cluttering the gesture system with even more of them is bad for the overall UX.

by dilyevsky2 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

Maybe you know this but it wasn't a physical button since i think iphone 7 - it was a haptic sensor.

by layer81 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

True, and in my opinion it was a worse experience than the previous physical one.

by m4633 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

I "adapted" to losing the fingerprint reader.

Wow, it has a lot of unexpected downsides.

I've a lot of unexpected behavior from the faceid thing. Lots of unexpected swipe-ups that drop me out of an app and put me on the home screen. Can't unlock in the dark, too close to your face, off to the side, in your pocket. Lots of "I saw your face an unlocked" that I didn't know had happened.

fingerprint sensor unlocked when you wanted it to, with haptics. switching apps was a button operation, not happening when you didn't expect it.

by lynndotpy2 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

Plus, fingerprint scanners can be activated without breaking eye contact with the person you're talking to. It's very anti-social technology.

It makes one look completely like a tool to pull out their iPhone and stare at it for ten seconds while checking out with a cashier. Deeply embarrassing and very annoying.

by MagicMoonlight1 hours ago|

parent|

prev|

[-]

What are you talking about? It doesn’t cause swipes. It uses IR so it doesn’t need light. You don’t want it to unlock in your pocket.

These new Gemini shill-agents are not very compelling.

by frereubu4 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

The thing I've come to like about FaceID on my 13 mini is that I can require it for certain apps to open that don't require it - e.g. messaging as opposed to banking which generally require some kind of auth by default - which is much better security in case someone snatches it out of my hand while it's unlocked. It's pretty seamless because I'm generally looking at the device anyway, and it's much less faff than it would be with TouchID.

by jeffbee3 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

I think the way the Pixel does it is strictly better across the board. The fingerprint sensor doesn't sacrifice screen space, and the platform offers face unlock as well.

by cyberax1 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

I only wish Pixel retained the back fingerprint sensor. It was sooooo much better than even the current under-the-screen sensor.

by billxreynolds10 minutes ago|

parent|

[-]

Agreed - the rear fingerprint sensor on my Pixel 5 was far better than the blinding on-screen sensor on my new Pixel 9a.

by dilyevsky2 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

I get that getting rid of touchid haptic eliminates dead space but still blows my mind they couldn't or refused to figure out screen-based touch id as an option at least. Samsung has it...

by daemonologist2 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

Under-screen fingerprint readers are definitely inferior - slower and less reliable. I (Android user) wish they'd revert to back-of-device readers, which were amazing.

(I also wish for smaller screens and no-adhesive battery swaps though, neither of which seems likely to happen.)

by loeg6 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

I'm also a touchID / iphone 8 size fan, but the nice cameras/zoom in flagship models are hard to give up. At least Face ID has improved significantly from the early days of iphone 10 -- it's faster and more reliable than it was on the older models if you tried it back then.