upvote
We each have our own car too. Hard to share the things people use at the same time.
reply
> Hard to share the things people use at the same time.

Yes, but if it's your goal to have fewer cars, then you'd make an effort not to need to use it at the same time. If that's not what you're trying to do, fine. My wife and I share a car. It's slightly inconvenient sometimes, but really not bad at all. For our particular life anyway.

So here we're talking about iPads. Some families need multiple devices for various reasons. Some don't except for the fact that iPads don't support accounts. No one's saying you would have to use them. But you're not allowed to.

reply
1 car for our family of four seems to work fine for us in the city. Hard to imagine people with different living situations.

I held off a while on giving my youngest child his own iPad because he and his brother were playing nicely together on one more often than not. It turned iPad time into social play-together time.

reply
Wait until your kids are older.
reply
What's the point here? Then you'll need another car?

Remember, we're comparing to iPads. Apple intentionally hobbles them to induce demand for multiple iPads. This isn't a question of being allowed to own multiple iPads/cars. It's a question of being artificially prevented from owning a single one.

The point isn't that you have to commit to being a single-car household for life. It's that at some points in time, you can be.

reply
> Hard to share the things people use at the same time.

How many TVs do you have in your living area?

reply
TVs are traditionally a shared experience. But even still, I have 2 TVs for every person in my household.
reply
Are you being sarcastic? Why would anyone need 2 TVs, much less every person in the house?
reply
How many phones do you have per person?
reply