Hacker News
new
past
comments
ask
show
jobs
points
by
klausa
10 hours ago
|
comments
by
aurareturn
10 hours ago
|
[-]
Interesting. This is clearly a big CPU change if so. I wonder why no E cores. I’m sure E cores would be more efficient at OS tasks than the new performance cores.
For example, 6 super, 8 performance, and 4 efficiency.
reply
by
NetMageSCW
9 hours ago
|
parent
|
[-]
Another commenter stated the P cores can be scaled down to be E cores dynamically, so why not?
reply
by
bombcar
8 hours ago
|
parent
|
next
[-]
I wonder if they'll get to good enough scaling from E to Super where they don't really need to distinguish anymore?
reply
by
aurareturn
9 hours ago
|
parent
|
prev
|
[-]
P cores would take up more die space.
reply