undefined

points

[-]

Current gen OLEDs almost don't wear out (saying this as an OLED owner). To see the wear you need to have a completely black room and the wear is unnoticeable unless you're specifically looking for it. You don't need to spend 3k, 1k is enough.

by craftkiller2 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

Ah, you should update wikipedia then: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OLED#Lifespan

by szmarczak1 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

> In 2016, LG Electronics reported an expected lifetime of 100,000 hours

23 years for an older generation OLED seems fine to me, I don't understand the problem here?

by craftkiller1 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

The US Department of Energy report from the same year reports far lower numbers, which I'd be more inclined to trust since they are impartial / not trying to market a product.

by szmarczak1 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

True, but those numbers are from 2016, 10 years ago. For a more apples to apples comparison see [1] [2] [3].

[1] https://youtu.be/H43wnV-v7V0

[2] https://youtu.be/RbEgQrigiLc

[3] https://youtu.be/AZfwHcMLorY

In my case, 3205 hours of use:

- 428 pixel cleans

- 1/3 brightness (my room is pretty dim and I often code during the night)

- static control on

- pixel shift on

- apl low

- sub-logo dim on

- corner dim on.

During the day I am not able to see any burn in. During the night it's unnoticeable unless you're looking for it. And it's only visible on gray backgrounds, unnoticeable during normal use. My phone (Nothing Phone 2) fails to capture it no matter how hard I try (even during the night).

The only issue I had was at 2417 hours and it was vertical white stripes like this: [4] but they were completely gone after a manual pixel clean. No issues since. I am never going back, worth every penny I spent.

[4] https://www.reddit.com/r/gigabyte/comments/1gyv1db/fo32u2_ve...

by xienze26 minutes ago|

parent|

[-]

That doesn’t sound very reassuring. 3205 hours, or a little over a year at 8 hours a day. Be generous and call it two years of use. You’re babying it with low brightness, dynamic dimming, etc. etc. and the fact that there’s anything, even if you have to “look for it”, is not a good sign.

by film425 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

I bought an LG 32" 4k OLED for $999 and it's hands down the best display I've ever used. No burn in even with lots of static browser/terminal windows for days and days. The fact that it's $3k and _not_ OLED is insulting.

by craftkiller3 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

I believe these monitors are meant for professionals, which means it is going to be used in bright office buildings. That means running the display at high brightness which is the worst case for OLED since they degrade faster at higher brightness. Quoting wikipedia:

> A US Department of Energy paper shows that the expected lifespans of OLED lighting products goes down with increasing brightness, with an expected lifespan of 40,000 hours at 25% brightness, or 10,000 hours at 100% brightness

by nicce3 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

> If I'm dropping $3k on a monitor, it needs to be a technology that lasts, not a technology that wears out over time.

I bought my OLED TV when fearmongering was the highest, and it still works perfectly with zero burn-ins. So it is definitely possible. I bought the tv 8 years ago.